Evaluation of a new test for the diagnosis of Amebiasis

Amebiasis is a parasitic infection caused byEntamoebahistolyticaand one of the most common parasitic infections world-wide, infecting about 50 million people and resulting in 10,000 to 40,000 deaths per annum.

Fig. 1. Cysts compatible with E. histolytica/ E. dispar/ E.moshkovskii. (400x)

Fig. 1. Cysts compatible withE. histolytica/ E. dispar/ E.moshkovskii. (400x)

The diagnosis ofE. histolyticainfection has traditionally relied upon microscopic examination of fresh or fixed stool specimens. However, microscopy has several limitations; the most important is the inability to distinguish the pathogenic speciesE. histolyticafrom the morphologically identical non-pathogenic speciesE. disparandE. moshkovskii. (Fig. 1)

Recently, molecular analysis like real-time PCR assay has been reported to show excellent sensitivity and specificity and it has been approved by the World Health Organization as the current method of choice for the diagnosis ofEntamoeba histolyticainfection. Unfortunately real-time PCR methods are not routinely available in most laboratories, especially in low-middle income countries. A rapid fecal antigen detection test could be a valid, alternative method for the diagnosis ofE. histolyticain resource-limited settings.

Using our in home real-time PCR as gold standard, we evaluated a new antigenE. histolyticadetection test, based on immunochromatographic technology. ImmunoCard STAT®CGE, is a new test which uses specific monoclonal antibodies againstCryptosporidium parvum,Giardia lambliaandEntamoebahistolyticathat detects all forms of the parasites during their life cycle.

To evaluate the test one-hundred fourteen samples were tested with the new rapid diagnostic test.

Of the 106 stool specimens tested, 18 were positive for E.histolyticaby real-time PCR, of which 16 were positive by ImmunoCard STAT, indicating a sensitivity of 88%. Of the 49 negative stool samples at the real-time PCR, 46 were confirmed by the ImmunoCard STAT assay (specificity 93.8% if assessed on this denominator). Of 39 samples positive for E.disparat real-time PCR, 31 (79%) resulted positive at the Immunocard STAT assay. (Tab. 1).

Tab. 1. Comparison of results of real-time PCR and ImmunoCardSTAT assay performed on stool specimens.

Tab. 1. Comparison of results of real-time PCR and ImmunoCardSTAT assay performed on stool specimens.

Of 8 specimens obtained from drainage of liver abscess, 7 were positive forE. histolyticaby real-time PCR, of which 2 (28%) were positive by Immunocard STAT.

The results of our study showed a reasonable sensitivity of the new test (88%). Specificity was also good (93.8%) if assessed over the denominator of negative samples at real-time PCR, but the test was not able to distinguish the species within theEntamoebacomplex in stool samples, probably detecting a common antigen ofE. histolytica/E. disparrather than a specific Ag for the former. Concerning liver abscess, the performance of ImmunoCard STAT was not good; only 2 out of 7 (28%) positive real-time PCR samples were detected by the antigen test.

In conclusion, our results suggest that ImmunoCard STAT may be considered a good test forEntamoebacomplex as a whole, but not for species identification, that should best rely on real-time PCR in order to correctly diagnose patients, reducing the morbidity and mortality of amoebiasis and minimizing unnecessary treatments of infections with non-pathogenic species.

Publication

[Evaluation of the new ImmunoCard STAT!® CGE test for the diagnosis of Amebiasis].
Formenti F, Perandin F, Bonafini S, Degani M, Bisoffi Z
Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2015 Aug

Facebook twitter linkedin mail Facebook twitter linkedin mail

Leave a Reply