Verticillium是一种真菌病原体导致血管会说吗ease in over 200 species of plants, including many crops. The fungus invades through the root and enters the water conducting xylem where it proliferates and rapidly becomes distributed widely in the plant, the primary symptom being leaf flaccidity and abscission. In tomato, resistance toV. dahliae, orV.albo-atrum, race1 has been attributed to theVe-resistance locus since the 1950s; yet, despite its economic importance and several decades of cell and molecular research, the way in whichVefunctions and the actual mechanism of resistance remains unclear. The locus comprises two closely related back-to-back genes,Ve1andVe2, which appear to encode membrane receptor proteins. Resistant plants have a dominantVe1allele encoding a full length receptor while susceptible plants (ve1/ve1)only have a truncated nonfunctional protein.

Fig. 1. Influence of Ve1 gene on tomato root size. Resistant (left) and susceptible (right) Craigella tomato seedlings were grown in pots until ready to set fruit and roots were examined after gentle soil removal.

Recent studies showed thatVe2is expressed constantly whileVe1is expressed at only low levels in healthy plants but is induced greatly when colonized byVerticilliumor even vascular bacteria. Initially, resistance was attributed toVe1alone; however, more recent analyses of changes in gene expression with an RNAi-suppressedVe2-gene showed thatVe2gene expression is necessary for the elevated stress/defense protein levels, normally associated with resistance; the Ve1 protein controls this in an antagonistic manner. Interestingly, and contrary to expectation, stress/defense protein levels, are significantly higher in susceptible plants suggesting that some disease symptoms (i.e. wilt, stunting) may result from the exaggerated stress/defense protein cascade in plants.

In the current paper we have investigated an alternate role of theVe1gene affecting plant growth and development. Experiments with healthy resistant and susceptible tomatoes, as well asVe1transformants, showed that in artificial medium or soil, root growth was enhanced significantly inVe1plants (Fig. 1). When infected withVerticillium,there was a significantly lower concentration of pathogen in resistant plants with larger root systems but an equal total fungal biomass in the roots of either the resistant or susceptible plants. Proteome analyses again showed an elevated stress/defense cascade, which correlated with fungal concentration rather than resistance. The fact that a similar total fungal biomass occurs in resistant and susceptible roots and that the presence of Ve1 protein promotes root growth in resistant plants suggests that a resistant host may be outgrowing the pathogen with fewer symptoms rather than relying on partial immunity alone. The perceived resistance is really resistance to symptom expression rather than to pathogen colonization.

Fig. 2. Proposed models for Ve R-gene function in tomato. (a) Membrane-bound Ve proteins interact with cellular kinase or phosphatase to induce or repress signaling for defense/stress or growth. (b) Ve1 protein forms dimers with Ve2 protein preventing an interaction with cellular kinase.

Taken together all the studies indicate thatVe1induction plays important roles in both the control of defense genes and the development of roots. More recent research indicates further thatVe1induction also has a role in the plant’s response to wounding and the regeneration of roots from cut stems. Clearly, theVe-locus represents an important signaling intercept in tomato. Consistent with this, proteome analyses have routinely shown thatVe1induction results in significant changes in levels of a large number of proteins involved in both primary and secondary metabolism. The antagonistic effects of the two genes, as well as functional domain comparisons have led us to speculate that the two proteins may signal opposing changes by phosphorylation (Ve2) or dephosphorylation (Ve1) as suggested in Figure 2(a). Alternatively, if receptor dimerization is central to Ve2 signaling, the Ve1 protein could act as a competitive inhibiter (Fig. 2(b)). Whatever the case, clearly theVe-locus is important for the plant’s control of defense and growth and possibly the pathogen’s ability to establish an endophytic relationship.

Ross N. Nazar, Jane Robb
Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada

Publication

Tomato Ve resistance locus; defense or growth.
Nazar RN, Xu X, Shittu H, Kurosky A, Robb J
Planta. 2018 Jun

Read offline:

Related Articles:

	The root is an ideal system to study magnetobiology in…Given that the origin and evolution of life had occurred in the presence of the geomagnetic field (GMF), it is possible that GMF information has been exploited by organisms as…
	Beneficial dust like a wall protecting a castle: the role of…Plants are often thought of as producing their nutrients through photosynthesis, but many plants associate with other organisms (microorganisms) to exchange nutrients for survival. In particular, orchids, which have threatened…
	Sheath blight of rice: challenges and managementRice (Oryza sativa L) is one of the most widely consumed cereal crops, grown in more than a hundred countries. Around 40,000 different varieties of rice exist in the world,…
	A novel gene controlling tiller development in barleyTillering or branching is an important agronomic trait closely related to crop yield. It is well documented that the yield of cereal crops, including wheat, rice and barley can be…
	Bioinspiration on the lotus leaf surface to develop…The production and application of synthetic materials in food packaging has grown quickly over the past few decades, resulting in serious environmental concerns due to the resistance to degradation of…
	Modulation of intracellular dopamine signaling by…Aripiprazole, a dopamine partial agonist, is one of the most widely prescribed atypical antipsychotics and its use in children and adolescents has become common. However, due to its favorable side…