Autophagy suppression decreases craniofacial bone mass

Macroautophagy (hereafter autophagy) is the main intracellular degradation mechanism to maintain cellular homeostasis by degrading misfolded proteins, recycling dysfunctional organelles, and generating energy fuels under physiological and pathological conditions. Autophagy consists of two major steps: autophagosome formation, including the nucleation—elongation—closure of the double-membrane vesicles, and subsequent fusion of lysosome and autophagsome, forming the autolysosome, where the degradation occurs.Fip200(FAK-familyInteractingProtein of200kDa) andAtg5(Autophagy-related5) are two essential autophagy genes that function at different steps of autophagy:Fip200is essential for autophagy induction andAtg5is essential for elongation of the autophagic membrane (Fig. 1). In recent years, numerous studies have showed that dysregulated autophagy is linked to many human diseases such as neurodegenerative disorders, myopathies, cardiac diseases, fibrosis of liver and lung, immune disorders, and cancer.

manbetx登录下载阿特拉斯的科学. Autophagy suppression decreases craniofacial bone mass.

Fig. 1. Autophagy consists of two major steps: autophagosome formation and subsequent fusion of lysosome and autophagosome, forming the autolysosome, where the degradation occurs. Fip200 (FAK-family Interacting Protein of 200 kDa) and Atg5 (Autophagy-related 5) are indispensable at indicated steps and they work with other autophagy genes (not shown here) to initiate and complete autophagy.

Investigations on the role of autophagy in skeletal system are of interest in recent years. The autophagy function has been suggested to play important roles in human bone health. Appropriate autophagy function is required to support bone development and homeostasis. Compared to other parts of skeleton such as long bone and vertebrae, the craniofacial bone has more complex osteogenesis. For example, craniofacial bones has dual embryo origins (neural crest and mesoderm) and dual ossification pathways (intramembranous and endochondral ossification) (Fig. 2). Despite the gradual understanding of autophagy in general skeletal homeostasis, its role in craniofacial bone formation and homeostasis is unclear.

We previously reported that autophagy suppression by deletingFip200leads to decreased bone mass in femurs and vertebrae in mice and compromises osteoblast mineralization. In this study, we deletedFip200andAtg5in osteoblast lineage cells usingOsterix-Creto investigate the effect of autophagy suppression on craniofacial bone acquisition. Our data demonstrated the important role of autophagy in craniofacial bone acquisition during development and postnatal growth. Interestingly, our data showed that autophagy suppression compromises the craniofacial bone acquisition to different degrees in bones formed through different ossification pathways. Cranial vault (such as frontal and parietal bones) and cranial base bones (such as presphenoid and basioccipital bones) are formed through intramembranous ossification and endochondral ossification respectively. Our data demonstrated that autophagy suppression by eitherFip200orAtg5deletion had bigger negative impact on cranial vault bone acquisition, indicating autophagy may play bigger role in the intramembranous ossification. In addition, our data showed thatFip200deletion led to a bigger bone mass reduction in neural crest-derived bones (such as frontal and presphenoid bones) than in mesoderm-derived bones (such as parietal and basioccipital bones), which may be partly explained by the reported intrinsic biological difference between neural crest-derived osteoblasts and mesoderm-derived osteoblasts. Lastly, our data showed a bigger decrease in bone mass in craniofacial bones deficient ofAtg5than those deficient ofFip200.

manbetx登录下载阿特拉斯的科学. Autophagy suppression decreases craniofacial bone mass.

Fig. 2. The craniofacial bones have dual embryonic origins and ossification pathways. Frontal and parietal bones in the cranial vault are formed through intramembranous ossification, but derived from neural crest and mesoderm, respectively; presphenoid and basioccipital bones in the cranial base are formed through endochondral ossification, derived from neural crest and mesoderm, respectively.

Although this difference may be explained by the higher deletion efficiency ofAtg5compared toFip200byOsterix-Cre, the alternative explanation is that this difference was caused by the autophagy- independent roles ofFip200and/orAtg5. Indeed, a common challenge in autophagy research field is that all autophagy genes have autophagy-independent functions. Thus, a crucial issue is how to prove that a phenotype and associated mechanism observed in autophagy mutant organism/cells is indeed solely caused by autophagy defect per se. With the availability of a novel FIP200-4A mutant knockin mouse model in which only the autophagy-specific function ofFip200is disrupted in vivo, we will be able to determine the specific contribution of autophagy to skeletal and craniofacial bone homeostasis in the near future.

Xiaoxi Wei1,Fei Liu2
1Department of Orthodontics, Jilin University Hospital of Stomatology, Changchun 130021, Jilin, China
2Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences & Prosthodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

Publication

Autophagy Regulates Craniofacial Bone Acquisition
Thomas N, Choi H, Wei X, Wang L, Mishina Y, Guan J, Liu F
Calcif Tissue Int. 2019 Nov

Facebook twitter linkedin mail Facebook twitter linkedin mail

Leave a Reply